| Chinese Text Project | |
| Simplified Chinese version |
| Search details: |
|---|
| Scope: Request type: Paragraph |
| Condition 1: References "谓白马为非马也，白马为非马者" Matched:6. |
| Total 6 paragraphs. Page 1 of 1. |
《先秦两汉 - Pre-Qin and Han》 | Related resources |
《名家 - School of Names》 | Related resources |
《公孙龙子 - Gongsunlongzi》 | [Warring States (475 BC - 221 BC)] | Books referencing 《公孙龙子》 Library Resources Source Related resources |
《迹府》 | Books referencing 《迹府》 Library Resources |
| 1 | 迹府: | 公孙龙，六国时辩士也。疾名实之散乱，因资材之所长，为“守白”之论。假物取譬，以“守白”辩，谓白马为非马也。白马为非马者，言白所以名色，言马所以名形也；色非形，形非色也。夫言色则形不当与，言形则色不宜从，今合以为物，非也。如求白马于廐中，无有，而有骊色之马，然不可以应有白马也。不可以应有白马，则所求之马亡矣；亡则白马竟非马。欲推是辩，以正名实而化天下焉。 |
《白马论 - White Horse Discourse》 | English translation: Donald Sturgeon [?] | Library Resources |
| 5 | 白马论: | 曰：有白马，不可谓无马也。不可谓无马者，非马也？有白马为有马，白之，非马何也？ |
| White Horse Discourse:...: | [A]: Having a white horse cannot be said to be having no horses. Is not that which cannot be said to be having no horses a horse? Having a white horse is having a horse; how can a white one not be a horse? | |
| 10 | 白马论: | 曰：以“有白马为有马”，谓有白马为有黄马，可乎？ |
| White Horse Discourse:...: | [B]: Taking their being white horses as there being horses, as calling there being white horses there being brown horses - is this admissible? | |
| 12 | 白马论: | 曰：以有马为异有黄马，是异黄马于马也；异黄马于马，是以黄马为非马。以黄马为非马，而以白马为有马，此飞者入池而棺椁异处，此天下之悖言乱辞也。 |
| White Horse Discourse:...: | [B]: Taking their being horses as different to there being brown horses, is to take brown horses as different to horses. Taking brown horses to be different to horses, is to take it that brown horses are not horses. To take brown horses as not horses, and yet take white horses as being horses, is to have the flying in a pond and the inner and outer coffins in different places: a contradictory claim and misuse of statements as there is under heaven! | |
| 13 | 白马论: | 曰：有白马，不可谓无马者，离白之谓也。不1离者有白马不可谓有马也。故所以为有马者，独以马为有马耳，非有白马为有马。故其为有马也，不可以谓马马也。 |
| White Horse Discourse:...: |
[A]: Having white horses cannot be called having no horses, this is what is meant by the separation of white. Not separating it, having white horses cannot be said to be having horses. Thus the reason why it is taken as having horses, is merely that "horses" are taken as "having horses", and "having white horses" is not "having horses". Thus on your taking it as having horses, one cannot call a horse a horse. 1. 不 : Another version reads: "是". 《百子全书》本“不”作“是”。 |
《汉代之后 - Post-Han》 |
《宋明 - Song-Ming》 |
《太平御览》 | [Northern Song] 977-984 | Library Resources |
《人事部一百五》 | Library Resources |
《辩下》 | Library Resources |
| 19 | 辩下: | 桓谭《新论》曰：公孙龙，六国时辩士也，为坚白之论，假物取譬，谓白马为非马。非马者，言白所以名色，马所以名形也。色非形，形非色。 |
| Total 6 paragraphs. Page 1 of 1. |
|---|