Follow us on Facebook to receive important updates Follow us on Twitter to receive important updates Follow us on sina.com's microblogging site to receive important updates Follow us on Douban to receive important updates
Chinese Text Project
Simplified Chinese version
Show statistics Edit searchSearch details:
Scope: Request type: Paragraph
Condition 1: References 齐桓公 : 姓名:姜小白,在位前685-前643。 Duke Huan of Qi (ruled 685 BC-643 BC) or coextensive terms Matched:1716.
Total 867 paragraphs. Page 1 of 87. Jump to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 87

先秦两汉 - Pre-Qin and Han

Related resources

儒家 - Confucianism

Related resources

论语 - The Analects

[Spring and Autumn - Warring States] 480 BC-350 BC
Books referencing 《论语》 Library Resources
Source
Related resources
[Also known as: "The Analects of Confucius", "The Confucian Analects"]

宪问 - Xian Wen

English translation: James Legge [?]
Books referencing 《宪问》 Library Resources
15 宪问:
子曰:“晋文公谲而不正,齐桓公正而不谲。”
Xian Wen:
The Master said, "The duke Wen of Jin was crafty and not upright. The duke Huan of Qi was upright and not crafty."

16 宪问:
子路曰:“桓公杀公子纠,召忽死之,管仲不死。”曰:“未仁乎?”子曰:“桓公九合诸侯,不以兵车,管仲之力也。如其仁!如其仁!”
Xian Wen:
Zi Lu said, "The duke Huan caused his brother Jiu to be killed, when Shao Hu died with his master, but Guan Zhong did not die. May not I say that he was wanting in virtue?" The Master said, "The Duke Huan assembled all the princes together, and that not with weapons of war and chariots - it was all through the influence of Guan Zhong. Whose beneficence was like his? Whose beneficence was like his?"

17 宪问:
子贡曰:“管仲非仁者与?桓公杀公子纠,不能死,又相之。”子曰:“管仲相桓公,霸诸侯,一匡天下,民到于今受其赐。微管仲,吾其被发左衽矣。岂若匹夫匹妇之为谅也,自经于沟渎,而莫之知也。”
Xian Wen:
Zi Gong said, "Guan Zhong, I apprehend, was wanting in virtue. When the Duke Huan caused his brother Jiu to be killed, Guan Zhong was not able to die with him. Moreover, he became prime minister to Huan." The Master said, "Guan Zhong acted as prime minister to the duke Huan, made him leader of all the princes, and united and rectified the whole kingdom. Down to the present day, the people enjoy the gifts which he conferred. But for Guan Zhong, we should now be wearing our hair unbound, and the lappets of our coats buttoning on the left side. Will you require from him the small fidelity of common men and common women, who would commit suicide in a stream or ditch, no one knowing anything about them?"

孟子 - Mengzi

[Warring States] 340 BC-250 BC English translation: James Legge [?]
Books referencing 《孟子》 Library Resources
Source
Related resources
[Also known as: "The Works of Mencius"]

梁惠王上 - Liang Hui Wang I

Library Resources
7 梁惠王上:
齐宣王问曰:“齐桓、晋文之事可得闻乎?”
Liang Hui Wang I:
The king Xuan of Qi asked, saying, 'May I be informed by you of the transactions of Huan of Qi, and Wen of Jin?'
孟子对曰:“仲尼之徒无道、文之事者,是以后世无传焉。臣未之闻也。无以,则王乎?”
Mencius replied, 'There were none of the disciples of Zhong Ni who spoke about the affairs of Huan and Wen, and therefore they have not been transmitted to these after-ages - your servant has not heard them. If you will have me speak, let it be about royal government.'
曰:“德何如,则可以王矣?”
The king said, 'What virtue must there be in order to attain to royal sway?'
曰:“保民而王,莫之能御也。”
Mencius answered, 'The love and protection of the people; with this there is no power which can prevent a ruler from attaining to it.'
曰:“若寡人者,可以保民乎哉?”
The king asked again, 'Is such an one as I competent to love and protect the people?'
曰:“可。”
Mencius said, 'Yes.'
曰:“何由知吾可也?”
'How do you know that I am competent for that?'
曰:“臣闻之胡齕曰,王坐于堂上,有牵牛而过堂下者,王见之,曰:‘牛何之?’对曰:‘将以衅钟。’王曰:‘舍之!吾不忍其觳觫,若无罪而就死地。’对曰:‘然则废衅钟与?’曰:‘何可废也?以羊易之!’不识有诸?”
'I heard the following incident from Hu He: "The king," said he, "was sitting aloft in the hall, when a man appeared, leading an ox past the lower part of it. The king saw him, and asked, Where is the ox going? The man replied, We are going to consecrate a bell with its blood. The king said, Let it go. I cannot bear its frightened appearance, as if it were an innocent person going to the place of death. The man answered, Shall we then omit the consecration of the bell ? The king said, How can that be omitted? Change it for a sheep." I do not know whether this incident really occurred.'
曰:“有之。”
The king replied, 'It did,'
曰:“是心足以王矣。百姓皆以王为爱也,臣固知王之不忍也。”
and then Mencius said, 'The heart seen in this is sufficient to carry you to the royal sway. The people all supposed that your Majesty grudged the animal, but your servant knows surely, that it was your Majesty's not being able to bear the sight, which made you do as you did.'
王曰:“然。诚有百姓者。齐国虽褊小,吾何爱一牛?即不忍其觳觫,若无罪而就死地,故以羊易之也。”
The king said, 'You are right. And yet there really was an appearance of what the people condemned. But though Qi be a small and narrow State, how should I grudge one ox? Indeed it was because I could not bear its frightened appearance, as if it were an innocent person going to the place of death, that therefore I changed it for a sheep.'
曰:“王无异于百姓之以王为爱也。以小易大,彼恶知之?王若隐其无罪而就死地,则牛羊何择焉?”
Mencius pursued, 'Let not your Majesty deem it strange that the people should think you were grudging the animal. When you changed a large one for a small, how should they know the true reason? If you felt pained by its being led without guilt to the place of death, what was there to choose between an ox and a sheep?
王笑曰:“是诚何心哉?我非爱其财。而易之以羊也,宜乎百姓之谓我爱也。”
The king laughed and said, 'What really was my mind in the matter? I did not grudge the expense of it, and changed it for a sheep! There was reason in the people's saying that I grudged it.'
曰:“无伤也,是乃仁术也,见牛未见羊也。君子之于禽兽也,见其生,不忍见其死;闻其声,不忍食其肉。是以君子远庖厨也。”
'There is no harm in their saying so,' said Mencius. 'Your conduct was an artifice of benevolence. You saw the ox, and had not seen the sheep. So is the superior man affected towards animals, that, having seen them alive, he cannot bear to see them die; having heard their dying cries, he cannot bear to eat their flesh. Therefore he keeps away from his slaughter-house and cook-room.'
王说曰:“《》云:‘他人有心,予忖度之。’夫子之谓也。夫我乃行之,反而求之,不得吾心。夫子言之,于我心有戚戚焉。此心之所以合于王者,何也?”
The king was pleased, and said, 'It is said in the Book of Poetry, "The minds of others, I am able by reflection to measure;" - this is verified, my Master, in your discovery of my motive. I indeed did the thing, but when I turned my thoughts inward, and examined into it, I could not discover my own mind. When you, Master, spoke those words, the movements of compassion began to work in my mind. How is it that this heart has in it what is equal to the royal sway?'
曰:“有复于王者曰:‘吾力足以举百钧’,而不足以举一羽;‘明足以察秋毫之末’,而不见舆薪,则王许之乎?”
Mencius replied, 'Suppose a man were to make this statement to your Majesty: "My strength is sufficient to lift three thousand catties, but it is not sufficient to lift one feather; my eyesight is sharp enough to examine the point of an autumn hair, but I do not see a waggon-load of faggots;" would your Majesty allow what he said?'
曰:“否。”
'No,' was the answer,
“今恩足以及禽兽,而功不至于百姓者,独何与?然则一羽之不举,为不用力焉;舆薪之不见,为不用明焉,百姓之不见保,为不用恩焉。故王之不王,不为也,非不能也。”
on which Mencius proceeded, 'Now here is kindness sufficient to reach to animals, and no benefits are extended from it to the people. How is this? Is an exception to be made here? The truth is, the feather is not lifted , because strength is not used; the waggon-load of firewood is not seen, because the eyesight is not used; and the people are not loved and protected, because kindness is not employed. Therefore your Majesty's not exercising the royal sway, is because you do not do it, not because you are not able to do it.'
曰:“不为者与不能者之形何以异?”
The king asked, 'How may the difference between the not doing a thing, and the not being able to do it, be represented?
曰:“挟太山以超北海,语人曰‘我不能’,是诚不能也。为长者折枝,语人曰‘我不能’,是不为也,非不能也。故王之不王,非挟太山以超北海之类也;王之不王,是折枝之类也。老吾老,以及人之老;幼吾幼,以及人之幼。天下可运于掌。《》云:‘刑于寡妻,至于兄弟,以御于家邦。’言举斯心加诸彼而已。故推恩足以保四海,不推恩无以保妻子。古之人所以大过人者无他焉,善推其所为而已矣。今恩足以及禽兽,而功不至于百姓者,独何与?权,然后知轻重;度,然后知长短。物皆然,心为甚。王请度之!抑王兴甲兵,危士臣,构怨于诸侯,然后快于心与?”
Mencius replied,'In such a thing as taking the Tai mountain under your arm, and leaping over the north sea with it, if you say to people "I am not able to do it," that is a real case of not being able. In such a matter as breaking off a branch from a tree at the order of a superior, if you say to people "I am not able to do it," that is a case of not doing it, it is not a case of not being able to do it. Therefore your Majesty's not exercising the royal sway, is not such a case as that of taking the Tai mountain under your arm, and leaping over the north sea with it. Your Majesty's not exercising the royal sway is a case like that of breaking off a branch from a tree. Treat with the reverence due to age the elders in your own family, so that the elders in the families of others shall be similarly treated; treat with the kindness due to youth the young in your own family, so that the young in the families of others shall be similarly treated - do this, and the kingdom may be made to go round in your palm. It is said in the Book of Poetry, "His example affected his wife. It reached to his brothers, and his family of the State was governed by it." The language shows how king Wen simply took his kindly heart, and exercised it towards those parties. Therefore the carrying out his kindness of heart by a prince will suffice for the love and protection of all within the four seas, and if he do not carry it out, he will not be able to protect his wife and children. The way in which the ancients came greatly to surpass other men, was no other but this - simply that they knew well how to carry out, so as to affect others, what they themselves did. Now your kindness is sufficient to reach to animals, and no benefits are extended from it to reach the people. How is this? Is an exception to be made here? By weighing, we know what things are light, and what heavy. By measuring, we know what things are long, and what short. The relations of all things may be thus determined, and it is of the greatest importance to estimate the motions of the mind. I beg your Majesty to measure it. You collect your equipments of war, endanger your soldiers and officers, and excite the resentment of the other princes - do these things cause you pleasure in your mind?'
王曰:“否。吾何快于是?将以求吾所大欲也。”
The king replied, 'No. How should I derive pleasure from these things? My object in them is to seek for what I greatly desire.'
曰:“王之所大欲可得闻与?”王笑而不言。
Mencius said, 'May I hear from you what it is that you greatly desire?' The king laughed and did not speak.
曰:“为肥甘不足于口与?轻暖不足于体与?抑为采色不足视于目与?声音不足听于耳与?便嬖不足使令于前与?王之诸臣皆足以供之,而王岂为是哉?”
Mencius resumed, 'Are you led to desire it, because you have not enough of rich and sweet food for your mouth? Or because you have not enough of light and warm clothing for your body? Or because you have not enough of beautifully coloured objects to delight your eyes? Or because you have not voices and tones enough to please your ears? Or because you have not enough of attendants and favourites to stand before you and receive your orders? Your Majesty's various officers are sufficient to supply you with those things. How can your Majesty be led to entertain such a desire on account of them?'
曰:“否。吾不为是也。”
'No,' said the king; 'my desire is not on account of them.'
曰:“然则王之所大欲可知已。欲辟土地,朝秦楚,莅中国而抚四夷也。以若所为求若所欲,犹缘木而求鱼也。”
Mencius added, 'Then, what your Majesty greatly desires may be known. You wish to enlarge your territories, to have Qin and Chu wait at your court, to rule the Middle Kingdom, and to attract to you the barbarous tribes that surround it. But doing what you do to seek for what you desire is like climbing a tree to seek for fish.'
王曰:“若是其甚与?”
The king said, 'Is it so bad as that?'
曰:“殆有甚焉。缘木求鱼,虽不得鱼,无后灾。以若所为,求若所欲,尽心力而为之,后必有灾。”
'It is even worse,' was the reply. 'If you climb a tree to seek for fish, although you do not get the fish, you will not suffer any subsequent calamity. But doing what you do to seek for what you desire, doing it moreover with all your heart, you will assuredly afterwards meet with calamities.'
曰:“可得闻与?”
The king asked, 'May I hear from you the proof of that?'
曰:“邹人与楚人战,则王以为孰胜?”
Mencius said, 'If the people of Zou should fight with the people of Chu, which of them does your Majesty think would conquer?'
曰:“楚人胜。”
'The people of Chu would conquer.'
曰:“然则小固不可以敌大,寡固不可以敌众,弱固不可以敌强。海内之地方千里者九,齐集有其一。以一服八,何以异于邹敌楚哉?盖亦反其本矣。今王发政施仁,使天下仕者皆欲立于王之朝,耕者皆欲耕于王之野,商贾皆欲藏于王之市,行旅皆欲出于王之涂,天下之欲疾其君者皆欲赴诉于王。其若是,孰能御之?”
'Yes - and so it is certain that a small country cannot contend with a great, that few cannot contend with many, that the weak cannot contend with the strong. The territory within the four seas embraces nine divisions, each of a thousand li square. All Qi together is but one of them. If with one part you try to subdue the other eight, what is the difference between that and Zou's contending with Chu? For, with such a desire, you must turn back to the proper course for its attainment. Now if your Majesty will institute a government whose action shall be benevolent, this will cause all the officers in the kingdom to wish to stand in your Majesty's court, and all the farmers to wish to plough in your Majesty's fields, and all the merchants, both travelling and stationary, to wish to store their goods in your Majesty's market-places, and all travelling strangers to wish to make their tours on your Majesty's roads, and all throughout the kingdom who feel aggrieved by their rulers to wish to come and complain to your Majesty. And when they are so bent, who will be able to keep them back?'
王曰:“吾惛,不能进于是矣。愿夫子辅吾志,明以教我。我虽不敏,请尝试之。”
The king said, 'I am stupid, and not able to advance to this. I wish you, my Master, to assist my intentions. Teach me clearly; although I am deficient in intelligence and vigour, I will essay and try to carry your instructions into effect.'
曰:“无恒产而有恒心者,惟士为能。若民,则无恒产,因无恒心。苟无恒心,放辟,邪侈,无不为已。及陷于罪,然后从而刑之,是罔民也。焉有仁人在位,罔民而可为也?是故明君制民之产,必使仰足以事父母,俯足以畜妻子,乐岁终身饱,凶年免于死亡。然后驱而之善,故民之从之也轻。今也制民之产,仰不足以事父母,俯不足以畜妻子,乐岁终身苦,凶年不免于死亡。此惟救死而恐不赡,奚暇治礼义哉?王欲行之,则盍反其本矣。五亩之宅,树之以桑,五十者可以衣帛矣;鸡豚狗彘之畜,无失其时,七十者可以食肉矣;百亩之田,勿夺其时,八口之家可以无饥矣;谨庠序之教,申之以孝悌之义,颁白者不负戴于道路矣。老者衣帛食肉,黎民不饥不寒,然而不王者,未之有也。”
Mencius replied, 'They are only men of education, who, without a certain livelihood, are able to maintain a fixed heart. As to the people, if they have not a certain livelihood, it follows that they will not have a fixed heart. And if they have not a fixed heart, there is nothing which they will not do, in the way of self-abandonment, of moral deflection, of depravity, and of wild license. When they thus have been involved in crime, to follow them up and punish them - this is to entrap the people. How can such a thing as entrapping the people be done under the rule of a benevolent man? Therefore an intelligent ruler will regulate the livelihood of the people, so as to make sure that, for those above them, they shall have sufficient wherewith to serve their parents, and, for those below them, sufficient wherewith to support their wives and children; that in good years they shall always be abundantly satisfied, and that in bad years they shall escape the danger of perishing. After this he may urge them, and they will proceed to what is good, for in this case the people will follow after it with ease. Now, the livelihood of the people is so regulated, that, above, they have not sufficient wherewith to serve their parents, and, below, they have not sufficient wherewith to support their wives and children. Notwithstanding good years, their lives are continually embittered, and, in bad years, they do not escape perishing. In such circumstances they only try to save themselves from death, and are afraid they will not succeed. What leisure have they to cultivate propriety and righteousness? If your Majesty wishes to effect this regulation of the livelihood of the people, why not turn to that which is the essential step to it? Let mulberry-trees be planted about the homesteads with their five mu, and persons of fifty years may be clothed with silk. In keeping fowls, pigs, dogs, and swine, let not their times of breeding be neglected, and persons of seventy years may eat flesh. Let there not be taken away the time that is proper for the cultivation of the farm with its hundred mu, and the family of eight mouths that is supported by it shall not suffer from hunger. Let careful attention be paid to education in schools, the inculcation in it especially of the filial and fraternal duties, and grey-haired men will not be seen upon the roads, carrying burdens on their backs or on their heads. It never has been that the ruler of a State where such results were seen, the old wearing silk and eating flesh, and the black-haired people suffering neither from hunger nor cold, did not attain to the royal dignity.'

公孙丑下 - Gong Sun Chou II

Books referencing 《公孙丑下》 Library Resources
11 公孙丑下:
孟子将朝王,王使人来曰:“寡人如就见者也,有寒疾,不可以风。朝将视朝,不识可使寡人得见乎?”对曰:“不幸而有疾,不能造朝。”
Gong Sun Chou II:
As Mencius was about to go to court to see the king, the king sent a person to him with this message: 'I was wishing to come and see you. But I have got a cold, and may not expose myself to the wind. In the morning I will hold my court. I do not know whether you will give me the opportunity of seeing you then.' Mencius replied, 'Unfortunately, I am unwell, and not able to go to the court.'
明日,出吊于东郭氏,公孙丑曰:“昔者辞以病,今日吊,或者不可乎!”曰:“昔者疾,今日愈,如之何不吊?”
Next day, he went out to pay a visit of condolence to some one of the Dong Guo family, when Gong Sun Chou said to him, 'Yesterday, you declined going to the court on the ground of being unwell, and to-day you are going to pay a visit of condolence. May this not be regarded as improper?' 'Yesterday,' said Mencius, 'I was unwell; to-day, I am better - why should I not pay this visit?'
王使人问疾,医来。孟仲子对曰:“昔者有王命,有采薪之忧,不能造朝。今病小愈,趋造于朝,我不识能至否乎?”使数人要于路,曰:“请必无归,而造于朝!”
In the mean time, the king sent a messenger to inquire about his sickness, and also a physician. Meng Zhong replied to them, 'Yesterday, when the king's order came, he was feeling a little unwell, and could not go to the court. To-day he was a little better, and hastened to go to court. I do not know whether he can have reached it by this time or not.' Having said this, he sent several men to look for Mencius on the way, and say to him, 'I beg that, before you return home, you will go to the court.'
不得已而之景丑氏宿焉。景子曰:“内则父子,外则君臣,人之大伦也。父子主恩,君臣主敬。丑见王之敬子也,未见所以敬王也。”
On this, Mencius felt himself compelled to go to Jing Chou's, and there stop the night. Mr. Jing said to him, 'In the family, there is the relation of father and son; abroad, there is the relation of prince and minister. These are the two great relations among men. Between father and son the ruling principle is kindness. Between prince and minister the ruling principle is respect. I have seen the respect of the king to you, Sir, but I have not seen in what way you show respect to him.'
曰:“恶!是何言也!齐人无以仁义与王言者,岂以仁义为不美也?其心曰‘是何足与言仁义也’云尔,则不敬莫大乎是。我非尧舜之道,不敢以陈于王前,故齐人莫如我敬王也。”
Mencius replied, 'Oh! what words are these? Among the people of Qi there is no one who speaks to the king about benevolence and righteousness. Are they thus silent because they do not think that benevolence and righteousness are admirable? No, but in their hearts they say, "This man is not fit to be spoken with about benevolence and righteousness." Thus they manifest a disrespect than which there can be none greater. I do not dare to set forth before the king any but the ways of Yao and Shun. There is therefore no man of Qi who respects the king so much as I do.'
景子曰:“否,非此之谓也。礼曰:‘父召,无诺;君命召,不俟驾。’固将朝也,闻王命而遂不果,宜与夫礼若不相似然。”
Mr. Jing said, 'Not so. That was not what I meant. In the Book of Rites it is said, "When a father calls, the answer must be without a moment's hesitation. When the prince's order calls, the carriage must not be waited for." You were certainly going to the court, but when you heard the king's order, then you did not carry your purpose out. This does seem as if it were not in accordance with that rule of propriety.'
曰:“岂谓是与?曾子曰:‘晋楚之富,不可及也。彼以其富,我以吾仁;彼以其爵,我以吾义,吾何慊乎哉?’夫岂不义而曾子言之?是或一道也。天下有达尊三:爵一,齿一,德一。朝廷莫如爵,乡党莫如齿,辅世长民莫如德。恶得有其一,以慢其二哉?故将大有为之君,必有所不召之臣。欲有谋焉,则就之。其尊德乐道,不如是不足与有为也。故汤之于伊尹,学焉而后臣之,故不劳而王;桓公之于管仲,学焉而后臣之,故不劳而霸。今天下地丑德齐,莫能相尚。无他,好臣其所教,而不好臣其所受教。汤之于伊尹,桓公之于管仲,则不敢召。管仲且犹不可召,而况不为管仲者乎?”
Mencius answered him, 'How can you give that meaning to my conduct? The philosopher Zeng said, "The wealth of Jin and Chu cannot be equalled. Let their rulers have their wealth - I have my benevolence. Let them have their nobility - I have my righteousness. Wherein should I be dissatisfied as inferior to them?" Now shall we say that these sentiments are not right? Seeing that the philosopher Zeng spoke them, there is in them, I apprehend, a real principle. In the kingdom there are three things universally acknowledged to be honourable. Nobility is one of them; age is one of them; virtue is one of them. In courts, nobility holds the first place of the three; in villages, age holds the first place; and for helping one's generation and presiding over the people, the other two are not equal to virtue. How can the possession of only one of these be presumed on to despise one who possesses the other two? Therefore a prince who is to accomplish great deeds will certainly have ministers whom he does not call to go to him. When he wishes to consult with them, he goes to them. The prince who does not honour the virtuous, and delight in their ways of doing, to this extent, is not worth having to do with. Accordingly, there was the behaviour of Tang to Yi Yin: he first learned of him, and then employed him as his minister; and so without difficulty he became sovereign. There was the behaviour of the duke Huan to Guan Zhong: he first learned of him, and then employed him as his minister; and so without difficulty he became chief of all the princes. Now throughout the kingdom, the territories of the princes are of equal extent, and in their achievements they are on a level. Not one of them is able to exceed the others. This is from no other reason, but that they love to make ministers of those whom they teach, and do not love to make ministers of those by whom they might be taught. So did Tang behave to Yi Yin, and the duke Huan to Guan Zhong, that they would not venture to call them to go to them. If Guan Zhong might not be called to him by his prince, how much less may he be called, who would not play the part of Guan Zhong!'

离娄下 - Li Lou II

Books referencing 《离娄下》 Library Resources
49 离娄下:
孟子曰:“王者之迹熄而诗亡,诗亡然后春秋作。晋之乘,楚之梼杌,鲁之春秋,一也。其事则齐桓、晋文,其文则史。孔子曰:‘其义则丘窃取之矣。’”
Li Lou II:
Mencius said, 'The traces of sovereign rule were extinguished, and the royal odes ceased to be made. When those odes ceased to be made, then the Chun Qiu was produced. The Sheng of Jin, the Tao Wu of Chu, and the Chun Qiu of Lu were books of the same character. The subject of the Chun Qiu was the affairs of Huan of Qi and Wen of Jin, and its style was the historical. Confucius said, "Its righteous decisions I ventured to make."'

告子下 - Gaozi II

Library Resources
27 告子下:
孟子曰:“五霸者,三王之罪人也;今之诸侯,五霸之罪人也;今之大夫,今之诸侯之罪人也。天子适诸侯曰巡狩,诸侯朝于天子曰述职。春省耕而补不足,秋省敛而助不给。入其疆,土地辟,田野治,养老尊贤,俊杰在位,则有庆,庆以地。入其疆,土地荒芜,遗老失贤,掊克在位,则有让。一不朝,则贬其爵;再不朝,则削其地;三不朝,则六师移之。是故天子讨而不伐,诸侯伐而不讨。五霸者,搂诸侯以伐诸侯者也,故曰:五霸者,三王之罪人也。
Gaozi II:
Mencius said, 'The five chiefs of the princes were sinners against the three kings. The princes of the present day are sinners against the five chiefs. The Great officers of the present day are sinners against the princes. The sovereign visited the princes, which was called "A tour of Inspection." The princes attended at the court of the sovereign, which was called "Giving a report of office." It was a custom in the spring to examine the ploughing, and supply any deficiency of seed; and in autumn to examine the reaping, and assist where there was a deficiency of the crop. When the sovereign entered the boundaries of a State, if the new ground was being reclaimed, and the old fields well cultivated; if the old were nourished and the worthy honoured; and if men of distinguished talents were placed in office: then the prince was rewarded - rewarded with an addition to his territory. On the other hand, if, on entering a State, the ground was found left wild or overrun with weeds; if the old were neglected and the worthy unhonoured; and if the offices were filled with hard taxgatherers: then the prince was reprimanded. If a prince once omitted his attendance at court, he was punished by degradation of rank; if he did so a second time, he was deprived of a portion of his territory; if he did so a third time, the royal forces were set in motion, and he was removed from his government. Thus the sovereign commanded the punishment, but did not himself inflict it, while the princes inflicted the punishment, but did not command it. The five chiefs, however, dragged the princes to punish other princes, and hence I say that they were sinners against the three kings.
“五霸,桓公为盛。葵丘之会诸侯,束牲、载书而不歃血。初命曰:‘诛不孝,无易树子,无以妾为妻。’再命曰:‘尊贤育才,以彰有德。’三命曰:‘敬老慈幼,无忘宾旅。’四命曰:‘士无世官,官事无摄,取士必得,无专杀大夫。’五命曰:‘无曲防,无遏籴,无有封而不告。’曰:‘凡我同盟之人,既盟之后,言归于好。’今之诸侯,皆犯此五禁,故曰:今之诸侯,五霸之罪人也。
'Of the five chiefs the most powerful was the duke Huan. At the assembly of the princes in Kui Qiu, he bound the victim and placed the writing upon it, but did not slay it to smear their mouths with the blood. The first injunction in their agreement was, "Slay the unfilial; change not the son who has been appointed heir; exalt not a concubine to be the wife." The second was, "Honour the worthy, and maintain the talented, to give distinction to the virtuous." The third was, "Respect the old, and be kind to the young. Be not forgetful of strangers and travellers." The fourth was, "Let not offices be hereditary, nor let officers be pluralists. In the selection of officers let the object be to get the proper men. Let not a ruler take it on himself to put to death a Great officer." The fifth was, "Follow no crooked policy in making embankments. Impose no restrictions on the sale of grain. Let there be no promotions without first announcing them to the sovereign." It was then said, "All we who have united in this agreement shall hereafter maintain amicable relations." The princes of the present day all violate these five prohibitions, and therefore I say that the princes of the present day are sinners against the five chiefs.
“长君之恶其罪小,逢君之恶其罪大。今之大夫,皆逢君之恶,故曰:今之大夫,今之诸侯之罪人也。”
'The crime of him who connives at, and aids, the wickedness of his prince is small, but the crime of him who anticipates and excites that wickedness is great. The officers of the present day all go to meet their sovereigns' wickedness, and therefore I say that the Great officers of the present day are sinners against the princes.'

礼记 - Liji

[Warring States (475 BC - 221 BC)] English translation: James Legge [?]
Books referencing 《礼记》 Library Resources
Source
Related resources
[Also known as: 《小戴礼记》, "The Classic of Rites"]

曾子问 - Zengzi Wen

English translation: James Legge [?]
Books referencing 《曾子问》 Library Resources
[Also known as: "The questions of Zeng-zi"]

18 曾子问:
曾子问曰:“丧有二孤,庙有二主,礼与?”
Zengzi Wen:
Zeng-zi asked, 'Is it according to rule "that at the mourning rites there should be two (performing the part of) the orphan son (and heir, receiving visitors), or that at a temple-shrine there should be two spirit-tablets?'
孔子曰:“天无二日,土无二王,尝禘郊社,尊无二上。未知其为礼也。昔者齐桓公亟举兵,作伪主以行。及反,藏诸祖庙。庙有二主,自桓公始也。丧之二孤,则昔者卫灵公适鲁,遭季桓子之丧,卫君请吊,哀公辞不得命,公为主,客人吊。康子立于门右,北面;公揖让升自东阶,西乡;客升自西阶吊。公拜,兴,哭;康子拜稽颡于位,有司弗辩也。今之二孤,自季康子之过也。”
Confucius said, 'In heaven there are not two suns; in a country there are not two kings; in the seasonal sacrifices, and those to Heaven and Earth, there are not two who occupy the highest place of honour. I do not know that what you ask about is according to rule. Formerly duke Huan of Qi, going frequently to war, made fictitious tablets and took them with him on his expeditions, depositing them on his return in the ancestral temple. The practice of having two tablets in a temple-shrine originated from duke Huan. As to two (playing the part of the) orphan son, it may be thus explained: Formerly, on occasion of a visit to Lu by duke Ling of Wei, the mourning rites of Ji Huan-zi were in progress. The ruler of Wei requested leave to offer his condolences. Duke Ai (of Lu), declined (the ceremony), but could not enforce his refusal. He therefore acted as the principal (mourner), and the visitor came in to condole with him. Kang-zi stood on the right of the gate with his face to the north. The duke, after the usual bows and courtesies, ascended by the steps on the east with his face towards the west. The visitor ascended by those on the west, and paid his condolences. The duke bowed ceremoniously to him, and then rose up and wailed, while Kang-zi bowed with his forehead to the ground, in the position where he was. The superintending officers made no attempt to put the thing to rights. The having two now acting as the orphan son arose from the error of Ji Kang-zi.'

郊特牲 - Jiao Te Sheng

English translation: James Legge [?]
Books referencing 《郊特牲》 Library Resources
[Also known as: "The single victim at the border sacrifices"]

8 郊特牲:
庭燎之百,由齐桓公始也。大夫之奏《肆夏》也,由赵文子始也。
Jiao Te Sheng:
(The use of) a hundred torches in his courtyard began with duke Huan of Qi. The playing of the Si Xia (at receptions) of Great officers began with Zhao Wen-zi.

杂记下 - Za Ji II

English translation: James Legge [?] Library Resources
[Also known as: "Miscellaneous records II"]

130 杂记下:
孔子曰:“管仲遇盗,取二人焉,上以为公臣,曰:‘其所与游辟也,可人也!’管仲死,桓公使为之服。宦于大夫者之为之服也,自管仲始也,有君命焉尔也。”
Za Ji II:
Confucius said, 'Guan Zhong selected two men from among (certain) thieves with whom he was dealing, and appointed them to offices in the state, saying, "They were led astray by bad men with whom they had associated, but they are proper men themselves." When he died, duke Huan made these two wear mourning for him. The practice of old servants of a Great officer wearing mourning for him, thus arose from Guan Zhong. But these two men only mourned for him by the duke's orders.'

Total 867 paragraphs. Page 1 of 87. Jump to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 87