Follow us on Facebook to receive important updates Follow us on Twitter to receive important updates Follow us on sina.com's microblogging site to receive important updates Follow us on Douban to receive important updates
Chinese Text Project
Search details:
Scope: Request type: Paragraph
Condition 1: References "是以民無飢而不得食,寒而不得衣" Matched:5.
Total 5 paragraphs. Page 1 of 1.

先秦兩漢 - Pre-Qin and Han

Related resources

墨家 - Mohism

Related resources
[Also known as: "Moism"]

墨子 - Mozi

[Spring and Autumn - Warring States] 490 BC-221 BC English translation: W. P. Mei [?]
Books referencing 《墨子》 Library Resources
Introduction
Source
Related resources
[Also known as: "Mo-tze"]

卷二 - Book 2

English translation: W. P. Mei [?] Library Resources

尚賢中 - Exaltation of the Virtuous II

English translation: W. P. Mei [?] Library Resources
6 尚賢中:
今王公大人中實將欲治其國家,欲脩保而勿失,胡不察尚賢為政之本也?且以尚賢為政之本者,亦豈獨子墨子之言哉!此聖王之道,先王之書距年之言也。傳曰:『求聖君哲人,以裨輔而身』,《湯誓》云:『聿求元聖,與之戮力同心,以治天下。』則此言聖之不失以尚賢使能為政也。故古者聖王唯能審以尚賢使能為政,無異物雜焉,天下皆得其利。古者舜耕歷山,陶河瀕,漁雷澤,堯得之服澤之陽,舉以為天子,與接天下之政,治天下之民。伊摯,有莘氏女之私臣,親為庖人,湯得之,舉以為己相,與接天下之政,治天下之民。傅說被褐帶索。庸築乎傅巖,武丁得之,舉以為三公,與接天下之政,治天下之民。此何故始賤卒而貴,始貧卒而富?則王公大人明乎以尚賢使能為政。是以民無飢而不得食,寒而不得衣,勞而不得息,亂而不得治者。
Exaltation of the Virtuous...:
If the rulers now want to govern their states so that they will be permanent and unshakeable, why do they not learn that exaltation of the virtuous is the foundation of government? Besides, is this principle merely a conception of Mozi? It is the way of the sage-kings and the tenet of "Ju Nian," a book of an ancient king. And, thus it is recorded: "(He) sought out the wise men to protect and aid you." And thus states the "Oath of Tang": "I then sought for the Great Sage, with whom I might unite my strength and mind to govern the empire." All these show how the sage-kings never failed to exalt the virtuous and employ the capable in government. The sage-kings of old comprehended onlv this -- to exalt the virtuous and employ the capable in government and nobody else; so the whole world was benefited. In times of old, Shun cultivated land at Mt. Li made pottery by the River, and was engaged in fishing in Lake Lei. Yao discovered him at Fuze. Exalting him, Yao made him Emperor and handed to him the government of the empire and the rule over the people. Yi Zhi once served in the bridal party of the daughter of the Prince of Xin, and later voluntarily served Tang as his cook. Tang discovered him. Exalting him, Tang made him his Prime Minister and handed to him the government of the empire and the rule over the people. Fu Yue once wore garments of coarse cloth tied with ropes, working as an artisan at Fu Yan. Wu Ding discovered him. Exalting him, Wu Ding made him High Duke and handed to him the government of the empire and the rule over the people. Why is it that these people starting in humility arrived at honour, starting in poverty arrived at wealth? It is because these rulers understood the importance of exalting the virtuous and employing the capable in government. Therefore, none of the people were hungry yet without food, cold yet without clothing, tired yet without rest, disturbed yet without peace.

尚賢下 - Exaltation of the Virtuous III

English translation: W. P. Mei [?] Library Resources
4 尚賢下:
古者聖王既審尚賢欲以為政,故書之竹帛,琢之槃盂,傳以遺後世子孫。於先王之書呂刑之書然,王曰:『於!來!有國有土,告女訟刑,在今而安百姓,女何擇言人,何敬不刑,何度不及。』能擇人而敬為刑,堯、舜、禹、湯、文、武之道可及也。是何也?則以尚賢及之,於先王之書豎年之言然,曰:『晞夫聖、武、知人,以屏輔而身。』此言先王之治天下也,必選擇賢者以為其群屬輔佐。曰今也天下之士君子,皆欲富貴而惡貧賤。曰然。女何為而得富貴而辟貧賤?莫若為賢。為賢之道將柰何?曰有力者疾以助人,有財者勉以分人,有道者勸以教人。若此則飢者得食,寒者得衣,亂者得治。若飢則得食,寒則得衣,亂則得治,此安生生。
Exaltation of the Virtuous...:
Having understood the principle of exalting the virtuous in government, the ancient sage-kings inscribed it on bamboos and silk and engraved it on the dishes and vases, to hand it down to their descendants. Thus we find in the "Penal Code of Lu", a book of an ancient king, the following: "The king said: 'Ho! come, ye rulers of states and territories, I will tell you how to make punishments a blessing. Now it is yours to give repose to the people: - what should you be most concerned about the choosing of? Should it not be proper men? What should you deal with the most reverently? Should it not be punishments? What should you calculate the most? Should it not be to whom they should reach?'" (This is to say) with insight in choosing men and considerateness in meting punishments, you can catch up with the ways of Yao, Shun, Yu, Tang, Wen, and Wu. How? By exaltation of the virtuous. Again in the book "Shu Nian", another book of an ancient king, we find: "He looked for wise men to protect and aid you." This is to say, when the ancient kings reigned over the empire they invariably selected the virtuous and made them officials and aids. The gentlemen in the world like riches and honour, and dislike poverty and humility. Now how can you obtain the former and avoid the latter? There is no better way than to practise virtue. What then is the way to practise virtue ? Let him who has strength be alert to help others, let him who has wealth endeavour to share it with others, let him who possesses the Dao (the way of nature and life) teach others persuasively. With this, the hungry will be fed, the cold will be clothed, the disturbed will have order. When the hungry are fed, the cold are clothed, and the disturbed have order - this is procuring abundant life.

卷八 - Book 8

Library Resources

非樂上 - Condemnation of Music I

English translation: W. P. Mei [?] Library Resources
2 非樂上:
今王公大人,雖無造為樂器,以為事乎國家,非直掊潦水折壤坦而為之也,將必厚措斂乎萬民,以為大鍾、鳴鼓、琴瑟、竽笙之聲。古者聖王亦嘗厚措斂乎萬民,以為舟車,既以成矣,曰:『吾將惡許用之?曰:舟用之水,車用之陸,君子息其足焉,小人休其肩背焉。』故萬民出財齎而予之,不敢以為慼恨者,何也?以其反中民之利也。然則樂器反中民之利亦若此,即我弗敢非也。然則當用樂器譬之若聖王之為舟車也,即我弗敢非也。民有三患:飢者不得食,寒者不得衣,勞者不得息,三者民之巨患也。然即當為之撞巨鍾、擊鳴鼓、彈琴瑟、吹竽笙而揚干戚,民衣食之財將安可得乎?即我以為未必然也。意舍此。今有大國即攻小國,有大家即伐小家,強劫弱,眾暴寡,詐欺愚,貴傲賤,寇亂盜賊並興,不可禁止也。然即當為之撞巨鍾、擊鳴鼓、彈琴瑟、吹竽笙而揚干戚,天下之亂也,將安可得而治與?即我未必然也。」是故子墨子曰:「姑嘗厚措斂乎萬民,以為大鍾、鳴鼓、琴瑟、竽笙之聲,以求興天下之利,除天下之害而無補也。」是故子墨子曰:「為樂,非也。」
Condemnation of Music I:...:
Now the rulers construct musical instruments as an undertaking of the state. They cannot be produced as easily as by evaporating water or digging into the earth. Inevitably heavy taxes have to be collected from the people to obtain sounds of the big bell, the sounding drum, the qin and the se, and the yu and the sheng. The ancient sage-kings had, indeed, collected heavy taxes from the people to build boats and vehicles. But when they were completed, and when the people asked: "What use have we for these?" the answer was: "The boats are to be employed on water and the vehicles on land, so that the gentlemen can rest their feet and the labourers can rest their shoulders and backs." Thus the people contributed their money and dared not grumble about it. This was because the boats and vehicles contributed to the benefit of the people. If the musical instruments also contribute to the benefit of the people, even I shall not dare condemn them. Thus if the musical instruments are as useful as the boats and carts with the sage-kings, even I shall not dare condemn them. There are three things that the people worry about, namely, that the hungry cannot be fed, that the cold cannot be clothed, and that the tired cannot get rest. These three are the great worries of the people. Now suppose we strike the big bell, beat the sounding drum, play the qin and the se, and blow the yu and the sheng, can the material for food and clothing then be procured for the people? Even I do not think this is possible. Again, every large state now attacks small states and every large house molests small houses. The strong plunder the weak, the many oppress the few, the clever deceive the stupid and the honoured disdain the humble. And bandits and thieves rise all together and cannot be suppressed. But can the chaos in the world be put in order by striking the big bell, beating the sounding drum, playing the qin and the se, and blowing the yu and the sheng? Even I do not think it is possible. Therefore Mozi said : The levy of heavy taxes on the people to construct the big bell, the sounding drum, the qin and the se, and the yu and the sheng, is not at all helpful in the endeavour to procure the benefits of the world and destroy its calamities. Therefore Mozi said: To have music is wrong.

卷九 - Book 9

Library Resources

非命下 - Anti-Fatalism III

English translation: W. P. Mei [?] Library Resources
2 非命下:
故昔者三代聖王禹湯文武方為政乎天下之時,曰:必務舉孝子而勸之事親,尊賢良之人而教之為善。是故出政施教,賞善罰暴。且以為若此,則天下之亂也,將屬可得而治也,社稷之危也,將屬可得而定也。若以為不然,昔桀之所亂,湯治之;紂之所亂,武王治之。當此之時,世不渝而民不易,上變政而民改俗。存乎桀紂而天下亂,存乎湯武而天下治。天下之治也,湯武之力也;天下之亂也,桀紂之罪也。若以此觀之,夫安危治亂存乎上之為政也,則夫豈可謂有命哉!故昔者禹湯文武方為政乎天下之時,曰『必使飢者得食,寒者得衣,勞者得息,亂者得治』,遂得光譽令問於天下。夫豈可以為命哉?故以為其力也!今賢良之人,尊賢而好功道術,故上得其王公大人之賞,下得其萬民之譽,遂得光譽令問於天下。亦豈以為其命哉?又以為力也!然今夫有命者,不識昔也三代之聖善人與,意亡昔三代之暴不肖人與?若以說觀之,則必非昔三代聖善人也,必暴不肖人也。然今以命為有者,昔三代暴王桀紂幽厲,貴為天子,富有天下,於此乎,不而矯其耳目之欲,而從其心意之辟,外之敺騁、田獵、畢弋,內湛於酒樂,而不顧其國家百姓之政,繁為無用,暴逆百姓,遂失其宗廟。其言不曰『吾罷不肖,吾聽治不強』,必曰『吾命固將失之』。雖昔也三代罷不肖之民,亦猶此也。不能善事親戚君長,甚惡恭儉而好簡易,貪飲食而惰從事,衣食之財不足,是以身有陷乎飢寒凍餒之憂。其言不曰『吾罷不肖,吾從事不強』,又曰『吾命固將窮。』昔三代偽民亦猶此也。
Anti-Fatalism III:
When the ancient sage-kings of the Three Dynasties, Yu, Tang, Wen, and Wu, ruled, they said: "We must promote the filial sons and encourage them in serving their parents, and we must honour the virtuous and good men and instruct them in doing good." In this way they administered the government and published instructions, rewarded the good and punished the evil. It seems in this way the confusion in the world could be reduced to order, and the danger of the state could be transformed into safety. If this is doubted, (let us recall): In ancient times, the disorder of Jie was reduced to order by Tang, that of Zhou was reduced to order by King Wu. Then the times did not change nor did the people alter. Yet when the superior changed regime the subordinates modified their conduct. With Jie and Zhou the world was chaotic, under Tang and Wu it became orderly. That the world became orderly was due to the endeavour of Tang and Wu. That the world was chaotic was due to the sin of Jie and Zhou. Judging from this, safety and danger, order and chaos all depend on the way the superior conducts the government. How can it be said, there is fate? In ancient times when Yu, Tang, Wen, and Wu ruled the empire, they said: "We must feed the hungry, clothe the cold, give the weary rest, and the disturbed peace." Thus their good name was heard all over the world. Can this be ascribed to fate? It is really due to endeavour. The virtuous and gentle of today respect virtue and pursue the ways and means (to benefit the world). Hence they are rewarded by the rulers above and praised by the people below. And their good name is heard all over the world. Can this be ascribed to fate? This is also due to their endeavour. Now, were those who believed in fate the sages of the Three Dynasties or the wicked of the Three Dynasties? Judging from the nature of this doctrine, it could not be the sages of the Three Dynasties, but must be the wicked that believed in fate. The ancient wicked kings of the Three Dynasties, Jie, Zhou, You, and Li, were honoured as emperors and possessed the whole world in wealth. Yet they could not control the sensuality of their ears and eyes, but gave rein to their passions. Going out they would race, hunt, and trap. Staying indoors they revelled in wine and music. They did not attend to the government of the country and the people, but did much that was of no use. And they oppressed and violated the people. Thus they lost their ancestral temple. They would not confess: "I am insolent and stupid. I did not attend to government diligently." But they would say: "It is but my fate that I lose it." Even the insolent people of the Three Dynasties were like this. They could not well serve their parents and their lord. They greatly hated politeness and frugality but liked licence and ease. They indulged in eating and drinking and were lazy at work. Their means of clothing and food became insufficient, and they incurred the danger of hunger and cold. They would not confess: "I am stupid and insolent, I am not diligent in my work." But they also said: "It is but my fate that I am poor." Thus the insolent people of the Three Dynasties also believed in fate.

漢代之後 - Post-Han

隋唐 - Sui-Tang

群書治要

[Tang] 631 Library Resources

卷三十四

Library Resources

墨子

Library Resources

非命

Library Resources
1 非命:
古之聖王,舉孝子而勸之事親,尊賢良而勸之為善,發憲布令以教誨,賞罰以勸沮,若此,則亂者可使治而危者可使安矣。若以為不然,昔者,桀之所亂,湯治之,紂之所亂,武王治之,此世不渝而民不改,上變正正作政而民易教,其在湯、武則治,其在桀、紂則亂,安危治亂,在上之發政也。則豈可謂有命哉。昔者,三代之暴王,不繆其耳目之淫,不慎其心志之僻,外之毆騁田獵畢弋,內沉於酒樂,不肯曰我為刑政不善,曰曰上有必字我命故且亡,雖昔也三代之僞民,亦猶此也。繁飾有命,以教衆愚,昔者,禹、湯、文、武方為政乎天下之時。曰:必使飢者得食,寒者得衣,勞者得息,亂者得治,遂得光譽令聞於天下,夫豈可以為命哉。故以為其力也。今賢良之人,尊賢而好蓄道術,故上得其王公大人之賞,下得其萬民之譽,遂得光譽令聞於天下,豈以為其命哉。

Total 5 paragraphs. Page 1 of 1.