| 梁惠王下: |
滕文公問曰:「齊人將築薛,吾甚恐。如之何則可?」 |
| Liang Hui Wang II: |
The duke Wen of Teng asked Mencius, saying, 'The people of Qi are going to fortify Xue. The movement occasions me great alarm. What is the proper course for me to take in the case?' |
| |
孟子對曰:「昔者大王居邠,狄人侵之,去之岐山之下居焉。非擇而取之,不得已也。苟為善,後世子孫必有王者矣。君子創業垂統,為可繼也。若夫成功,則天也。君如彼何哉?彊為善而已矣。」 |
| |
Mencius replied, 'Formerly, when king Tai dwelt in Bin, the barbarians of the north were continually making incursions upon it. He therefore left it, went to the foot of mount Qi, and there took up his residence. He did not take that situation, as having selected it. It was a matter of necessity with him. If you do good, among your descendants, in after generations, there shall be one who will attain to the royal dignity. A prince lays the foundation of the inheritance, and hands down the beginning which he has made, doing what may be continued by his successors. As to the accomplishment of the great result, that is with Heaven. What is that Qi to you, 0 prince? Be strong to do good. That is all your business.' |
| 梁惠王下: |
滕文公問曰:「滕,小國也。竭力以事大國,則不得免焉。如之何則可?」 |
| Liang Hui Wang II: |
The duke Wen of Teng asked Mencius, saying, 'Teng is a small State. Though I do my utmost to serve those large kingdoms on either side of it, we cannot escape suffering from them. What course shall I take that we may do so?' |
| |
孟子對曰:「昔者大王居邠,狄人侵之。事之以皮幣,不得免焉;事之以犬馬,不得免焉;事之以珠玉,不得免焉。乃屬其耆老而告之曰:『狄人之所欲者,吾土地也。吾聞之也:君子不以其所以養人者害人。二三子何患乎無君?我將去之。』去邠,踰梁山,邑于岐山之下居焉。邠人曰:『仁人也,不可失也。』從之者如歸市。或曰:『世守也,非身之所能為也。效死勿去。』君請擇於斯二者。」 |
| |
Mencius replied, 'Formerly, when king Tai dwelt in Bin, the barbarians of the north were constantly making incursions upon it. He served them with skins and silks, and still he suffered from them. He served them with dogs and horses, and still he suffered from them. He served them with pearls and gems, and still he suffered from them. Seeing this, he assembled the old men, and announced to them, saying, "What the barbarians want is my territory. I have heard this - that a ruler does not injure his people with that wherewith he nourishes them. My children, why should you be troubled about having no prince? I will leave this." Accordingly, he left Bin, crossed the mountain Liang, built a town at the foot of mount Qi, and dwelt there. The people of Pin said, "He is a benevolent man. We must not lose him." Those who followed him looked like crowds hastening to market. On the other hand, some say, "The kingdom is a thing to be kept from generation to generation. One individual cannot undertake to dispose of it in his own person. Let him be prepared to die for it. Let him not quit it." I ask you, prince, to make your election between these two courses.' |
| 讓王: |
大王亶父居邠,狄人攻之。事之以皮帛而不受,事之以犬馬而不受,事之以珠玉而不受,狄人之所求者土地也。大王亶父曰:「與人之兄居而殺其弟,與人之父居而殺其子,吾不忍也。子皆勉居矣!為吾臣與為狄人臣,奚以異?且吾聞之,不以所用養害所養。」因杖筴而去之。民相連而從之,遂成國於岐山之下。夫大王亶父可謂能尊生矣。能尊生者,雖貴富不以養傷身,雖貧賤不以利累形。今世之人,居高官尊爵者,皆重失之,見利輕亡其身,豈不惑哉! |
| Kings who have wished...: |
When Dai-wang Dan-fu was dwelling in Bin, the wild tribes of the North attacked him. He tried to serve them with skins and silks, but they were not satisfied. He tried to serve them with dogs and horses, but they were not satisfied, and then with pearls and jade, but they were not satisfied. What they sought was his territory. Dai-wang Dan-fu said (to his people), 'To dwell with the elder brother and cause the younger brother to be killed, or with the father and cause the son to be killed,-- this is what I cannot bear to do. Make an effort, my children, to remain here. What difference is there between being my subjects, or the subjects of those wild people? And I have heard that a man does not use that which he employs for nourishing his people to injure them.' Thereupon he took his staff and switch and left, but the people followed him in an unbroken train, and he established a (new) state at the foot of mount Qi. Thus Dai-wang Dan-fu might be pronounced one who could give its (due) honour to life. Those who are able to do so, though they may be rich and noble, will not, for that which nourishes them, injure their persons; and though they may be poor and mean, will not, for the sake of gain, involve their bodies (in danger). The men of the present age who occupy high offices and are of honourable rank all lose these (advantages) again, and in the prospect of gain lightly expose their persons to ruin: is it not a case of delusion? |