| Chinese Text Project Data wiki |
進士 Jinshi[View] [Edit] [History]ctext:887838
| Relation | Target | Textual basis |
|---|---|---|
| type | examstatus | |
| name | 進士 | |
| pinyin Jìnshì | ||
| authority-wikidata | Q420477 | |
| link-wikipedia_zh | 进士 | |
| link-wikipedia_en | Jinshi | |
Jinshi ([[wikt:進士 jìnshì) was the highest and final degree in the imperial examination in Imperial China. The examination was usually taken in the imperial capital in the palace, and was also called the Metropolitan Exam. Recipients are sometimes referred to in English-language sources as Imperial Scholars.The jinshi degree was first created after the institutionalization of the civil service exam. Initially it had been "for six categories" but was later consolidated into a single degree. The examination system first appeared during the Han dynasty, but the jinshi degree first appeared under the reign of Emperor Yang of Sui. During the Tang dynasty, every year around one to two percent of test takers would obtain a jinshi title out of a total of one to two thousand test takers.
The numbers of jinshi degrees given out were increased in the Song dynasty, and the examinations were given every three years. Most senior officials of the Song dynasty were jinshi holders.
The Ming dynasty resumed the civil-service exam after its occurrence became more irregular in the Yuan dynasty. After the reign of the Emperor Yingzong of Ming, it became the rule that only jinshi holders could enter the Hanlin Academy. On average around 89 jinshi per year were conferred.
During the Qing dynasty around 102 jinshi degrees were given a year.
The highest scoring jinshi in the country was known as the zhuangyuan, a term that survives today as a high scoring gaokao test taker or just someone who is very good at a skill.
Read more...: Subtypes of jinshi recipients" onclick="document.getElementById('wikidesc_full_en').style.display='block';">jinshi recipients">Subtypes of jinshi recipients References
進士原是科舉的科目之一。中國古代科舉制度中,通過最後一級中央朝廷考試者,稱為進士。到了元朝以後,惟存進士一科,遂成為科舉功名的最高等級。民間又稱考中進士為「金榜題名」。| Source | Relation | from-date |
|---|---|---|
| 錢繼登 | exam-status | 1616/2/17 - 1617/2/5萬曆丙辰年 |
| 嚴起恒 | exam-status | 1631/2/1 - 1632/2/19崇禎四年 |
| 楊廷麟 | exam-status | 1631/2/1 - 1632/2/19崇禎四年 |
| 何世璂 | exam-status | 1709/2/10 - 1710/1/29康熙己丑年 |
| 梅瑴成 | exam-status | 1715/2/4 - 1716/1/23康熙乙未年 |
| 李因培 | exam-status | 1745/2/1 - 1746/1/21乾隆十年 |
| 馮敏昌 | exam-status | 1778/1/28 - 1779/2/15乾隆戊戌年 |
| 喬用遷 | exam-status | 1814/1/21 - 1815/2/8嘉慶甲戌年 |
| 張日晸 | exam-status | 1817/2/16 - 1818/2/4嘉慶二十二年 |
| 吳文鎔 | exam-status | 1819/1/26 - 1820/2/13嘉慶二十四年 |
| [+ Additional items] | exam-status | |
| 賜進士出身 | kind-of |
| Text | Count |
|---|---|
| 清史稿 | 1018 |
| 曾文正公年譜 | 1 |
| 玉堂叢語 | 10 |
| 閩縣鄉土志 | 64 |
| 三藩紀事本末 | 2 |
| 貴州通志 | 19 |
| 明儒學案 | 1 |
| 欽定續文獻通考 | 50 |
| 李昌谷詩注 | 1 |
| 清史紀事本末 | 1 |
| 舊聞證誤 | 10 |
| 萇楚齋四筆 | 31 |
| 金史 | 120 |
| 晚晴簃詩匯 | 1629 |
| 皇明典故紀聞 | 1 |
| 福州府志乾隆本 | 1234 |
| 宋元學案 | 39 |
| 四庫未收書提要 | 18 |
| 明史 | 1393 |
| 全唐文 | 7 |
| 江南通志 | 3 |
| 萇楚齋續筆 | 7 |
| 衡山縣志 | 1 |
| 世宗憲皇帝上諭內閣 | 71 |
| 清稗類鈔 | 80 |
| 閩中理學淵源考 | 20 |
| 四川通志 | 1 |
| 唐才子傳 | 16 |
| 宋史紀事本末 | 1 |
| 四庫全書總目提要 | 2245 |
| 郡齋讀書志 | 158 |
| 雍正上諭 | 4 |
| 閱微草堂筆記 | 1 |
| 禮部志稿 | 10 |
| 江表志 | 1 |
| 小腆紀傳 | 189 |
| 宋史翼 | 67 |
| 書史會要 | 34 |
| 菽園雜記 | 19 |
| 熙朝新語 | 14 |
| 明季北略 | 134 |
| 琉球國志略 | 1 |
| 直齋書錄解題 | 18 |
| 皇清書史 | 776 |
| 明儒言行錄 | 5 |
| 清實錄雍正朝實錄 | 4 |
| 廣西通志 | 5 |
| 國朝畫徵錄 | 20 |
| 道園學古錄 | 16 |
| 遼史 | 17 |
| 元史 | 10 |
| 太學進士題名碑錄 | 111 |
| 樞垣記略 | 2 |
| 五百羅漢像贊 | 1 |
| 新世說 | 4 |
| 海東逸史 | 5 |
| 查東山先生年譜 | 11 |
| 千頃堂書目 | 242 |
| 宋史 | 460 |
| 小腆紀年 | 163 |
| 御製悅心集 | 18 |
| 十國春秋 | 6 |
| 無聲詩史 | 4 |
| 魯春秋 | 17 |
| Enjoy this site? Please help. | Site design and content copyright 2006-2026. When quoting or citing information from this site, please link to the corresponding page or to http://ctext.org. Please note that the use of automatic download software on this site is strictly prohibited, and that users of such software are automatically banned without warning to save bandwidth. 沪ICP备09015720号-3 | Comments? Suggestions? Please raise them here.Do not click this link |