Follow us on Facebook to receive important updates Follow us on Twitter to receive important updates Follow us on sina.com's microblogging site to receive important updates Follow us on Douban to receive important updates
Chinese Text Project
Back Forward
Daoism -> Zhuangzi -> Miscellaneous Chapters -> Ze-yang -> 12

Shao Zhi said,
'Ji Zhen holds that (the Dao) forbids all action,
使 and Jie-zi holds that it may perhaps allow of influence.
Which of the two is correct in his statements,
?」 and which is one-sided in his ruling?'
調 Da-gong Diao replied,
'Cocks crow and dogs bark
- this is what all men know.
But men with the greatest wisdom
cannot describe in words whence it is that they are formed (with such different voices),
nor can they find out by thinking what they wish to do.
We may refine on this small point;
till it is so minute that there is no point to operate on,
or it may become so great that there is no embracing it.
使 "Some one caused it;"
"No one did it;"
but we are thus debating about things; and the end is that we shall find we are in error.
使"Some one caused it" - then there was a real Being.
"No one did it" - then there was mere vacancy.
To have a name and a real existence
- that is the condition of a thing.
Not to have a name, and not to have real being
- that is vacancy and no thing.
We may speak and we may think about it, but the more we speak, the wider shall we be of the mark.
Birth, before it comes, cannot be prevented; death, when it has happened, cannot be traced farther.
Death and life are not far apart; but why they have taken place cannot be seen.
使 That some one has caused them,
or that there has been no action in the case
are but speculations of doubt.
When I look for their origin,
it goes back into infinity;
when I look for their end,
it proceeds without termination.
Infinite, unceasing,
there is no room for words about (the Dao).
To regard it as in the category of things
使 is the origin of the language that it is caused or that it is the result of doing nothing;
but it would end as it began with things.
The Dao cannot have a (real) existence;
if it has, it cannot be made to appear as if it had not.
The name Dao is a metaphor, used for the purpose of description.
使To say that it causes or does nothing
is but to speak of one phase of things,
and has nothing to do with the Great Subject.
If words were sufficient for the purpose,
in a day's time we might exhaust it;
since they are not sufficient,
we may speak all day, and only exhaust (the subject of) things.
The Dao is the extreme to which things conduct us.
Neither speech nor silence is sufficient to convey the notion of it.
Neither by speech nor by silence
。」 can our thoughts about it have their highest expression.


Enjoy this site? Please help.Site design and content copyright 2006-2024. When quoting or citing information from this site, please link to the corresponding page or to https://ctext.org. Please note that the use of automatic download software on this site is strictly prohibited, and that users of such software are automatically banned without warning to save bandwidth. 沪ICP备09015720号-3Comments? Suggestions? Please raise them here.