在Facebook上關注我們,隨時得到最新消息 在Twitter上關注我們,隨時得到最新消息 在新浪微博上關注我們,隨時得到最新消息 在豆瓣上關注我們,隨時得到最新消息
中國哲學書電子化計劃
討論區 -> 原典議題 -> some sort of commentary?

此主題涉及到:
2011-09-24 16:42:41some sort of commentary?
發言者:bao_pu (Scott Barnwell)My own copy of the Hanshu Yiwenzhi has more content than the one on this site. For example, for Wenzi, it reads: 《文子》九篇。老子弟子,與孔子並時,而稱周平王問,似依託者也。 whereas this site just has 《文子》九篇。
Can someone explain this to me?
TIA

2011-09-26 04:07:37some sort of commentary?
發言者:dsturgeon (Donald Sturgeon)Hi Scott,

The version on this site doesn't include any of 顏師古's commentary - you may want to compare it with this edition:
ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&...

2011-09-26 17:39:37some sort of commentary?
發言者:bao_pu (Scott Barnwell)Thanks very much Don,
I had previously thought that that extra information was of a Han date. It's good to know that the commentary is from the Tang. Does this commentary have a title?

2011-09-27 02:41:30some sort of commentary?
發言者:remnantIt is just called 汉书注 (Commentary to the Hanshu) and was the first authoritative commentary. It is included in most scholarly editions. The next truly comprehensive commentary was 王先谦's 汉书補注 (Supplemental Commentary to the Hanshu) from the late Qing, which incorporated the commentaries, notes and scholarly fruit of numerous other commentators between Yan Shugu and the Qing.

There is a fairly comprehensive list of commentators (most of them just partial commentaries or notes) of the Hanshu at the following link:

zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%B1%8...


2012-08-09 23:22:44some sort of commentary?
發言者:bao_pu (Scott Barnwell)
Quote: dsturgeon @ 2011-09-26 04:07:37
Hi Scott,

The version on this site doesn't include any of 顏師古's commentary - you may want to compare it with this edition:
ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&...


Donald,
I've asked someone about this matter just recently and he says that "老子弟子,與孔子並時,而稱周平王問,似依託者也。" in the Wenzi example is NOT Yan Shigu's commentary, but is instead Liu Xiang's/Ban Gu's. He points to the next entry (on page 83 of the link you provided) to show where Yan Shigu's commentary is indicated by "Shigu says" (師古曰). He says that although perhaps counterintuitive, the small print was written by Liu Xiang/Ban Gu. (He also refers me to p. 1729 of the 中华书局, which I do not have access to.)

If this is the case, there is a lot of information missing from your Yiwenzhi Chinese text!

2012-08-25 02:17:57some sort of commentary?
發言者:dsturgeon (Donald Sturgeon)Hi Scott,

Thanks for that and sorry for taking so long to reply; I've been away from home for some time for a number of reasons. You may well be correct about some parts of the commentary, but I'll need to look in to the details once I get back to Hong Kong in a couple of days. Please post again here if you find out any more clues.

2012-08-30 08:11:45some sort of commentary?
發言者:dsturgeon (Donald Sturgeon)Looking into it a little I think you're right, part of the commentary does seem to be attributed to Ban Gu himself. According to 張舜徽's 《漢書藝文志通釋》(p.11):
「凡正文下旁注小字不稱姓字者,皆班氏自注之辭。」

I'll try to get the commentary added in, but this may take some time.



若您想要參與討論,請在下述的表格輸入您的CTP賬號及密碼登錄。若您尚未申請CTP賬號,請免費註冊

登入
帳號:
密碼:
不要自動登出
忘記密碼

喜歡我們的網站請支持我們的發展網站的設計與内容(c)版權2006-2021如果您想引用本網站上的内容,請同時加上至本站的鏈接:https://ctext.org/zh。請注意:嚴禁使用自動下載軟体下載本網站的大量網頁,違者自動封鎖,不另行通知。沪ICP备09015720号-3若有任何意見或建議,請在此提出