| | 公孙丑下: |
沈同以其私问曰：“燕可伐与？” |
| Gong Sun Chou II: |
Shen Tong, on his own impulse, asked Mencius, saying, 'May Yan be smitten?' |
| | |
孟子曰：“可。子哙不得与人燕，子之不得受燕于子哙。有仕于此，而子悦之，不告于王而私与之吾子之禄爵；夫士也，亦无王命而私受之于子，则可乎？何以异于是？” |
| |
Mencius replied, 'It may. Zi Kuai had no right to give Yan to another man, and Zi Zhi had no right to receive Yan from Zi Kuai. Suppose there were an officer here, with whom you, Sir, were pleased, and that, without informing the king, you were privately to give to him your salary and rank; and suppose that this officer, also without the king's orders, were privately to receive them from you - would such a transaction be allowable? And where is the difference between the case of Yan and this?' |
| | |
齐人伐燕。或问曰：“劝齐伐燕，有诸？” |
| |
The people of Qi smote Yan. Some one asked Mencius, saying, 'Is it really the case that you advised Qi to smite Yan?' |
| | |
曰：“未也。沈同问‘燕可伐与’？吾应之曰‘可’，彼然而伐之也。彼如曰‘孰可以伐之’？则将应之曰：‘为天吏，则可以伐之。’今有杀人者，或问之曰‘人可杀与’？则将应之曰‘可’。彼如曰‘孰可以杀之’？则将应之曰：‘为士师，则可以杀之。’今以燕伐燕，何为劝之哉？” |
| |
He replied, 'No. Shen Tong asked me whether Yan might be smitten, and I answered him, "It may." They accordingly went and smote it. If he had asked me, "Who may smite it?" I would have answered him, "He who is the minister of Heaven may smite it." Suppose the case of a murderer, and that one asks me, "May this man be put to death?" I will answer him, "He may." If he ask me, "Who may put him to death?" I will answer him, "The chief criminal judge may put him to death." But now with one Yan to smite another Yan - how should I have advised this?' |
