<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Translations - Meaning of "取" in context</title>
<description>Translations - Meaning of "取" in context</description>
<link>http://ctext.org/</link>
<language>en</language>
<atom:link href="http://ctext.org/rss.pl?if=en&amp;thread=8978869&amp;remap=gb" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
<title>Meaning of "取" in context</title>
<link>http://ctext.org/discuss.pl?if=en&amp;message=8978869&amp;remap=gb</link>
<description><![CDATA[Current translation of "非我无所取" is "if there were not I (with my views), his would be uncalled for".<br /><br />This may be inaccurate due to misunderstanding of "取" in context. The same character is used in #1 "... 咸其自取，怒者其谁邪". In that context, it is clear that "自取" means "self-selecting" or "self-determination" and "取" takes meaning of "selecting" or "determination".<br /><br />Here (#3), "取" shall take the same meaning. Therefore, the whole sentence "非彼无我，非我无所取。" means "If there were not 'others', there should not be 'me'; If there was not 'me', there should not be any (self-)determination."<br /><br />This interpretation fits the context better imo because: #1 sets up the question of "who is it that stirs it all up (i.e., existence of omnipresence/creator)"; #2 explores the idea of "此" (i.e., here/present) to interpret the creator with kind of a circular argument; #3 (with the new translation) then expands to theorize that "彼" ('others') as the creator who cannot be known fully (see "是亦近矣，而不知其所为使。")<br />]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 03:56:23 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://ctext.org/discuss.pl?if=en&amp;message=8978869&amp;remap=gb</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
