Follow us on Facebook to receive important updates Follow us on Twitter to receive important updates Follow us on sina.com's microblogging site to receive important updates Follow us on Douban to receive important updates
Chinese Text Project Wiki
Simplified Chinese version
-> -> -> Search for "崲"
Search details:
Scope: 唐宋文醇
Condition : Contains text “崲”
Total 1

卷五十五

24
鉴湖一曰南湖南并山北属州城漕渠东西距江汉顺帝永和五年会稽太守马臻之所为也至今九百七十有五年矣其周三百五十有八里凡水之出于东南者皆委之州之东自城至于东江其北堤石木达二阴沟十有九通民田田之南属漕渠北东西属江者皆溉之州之东六十里自东城至于东江其南堤阴沟十有四通民田田之北抵漕渠南并山西并堤东属江者皆溉之州之西三十里曰柯山斗门通民田田之东并城南并堤北滨漕渠西属江者皆溉之总之溉山阴会稽两县十四乡之田九千顷非湖能溉田九千顷而已盖田之至江者尽于九千顷也其东曰曹娥斗门曰蒿口斗门水之循南堤而东者由之以入于东江其西曰广陵斗门曰新径斗门水之循北堤而西者由之以入于西江其北曰朱储斗门去湖最远盖因三江之上两山之间疏为二门而以时视田中之水小溢则纵其一、大溢则尽纵之使入于三江之口所谓湖高于田丈馀田又高海丈馀水少则泄湖溉田水多则泄田中水入海故无荒废之田水旱之岁者也繇汉以来几千载其利未尝废也宋兴民始有盗湖为田者祥符之间二十七户庆历之间二户为田四顷当是时三司转运司犹下书切责州县使复田为湖然自此吏益慢法而奸民浸起至于治平之间盗湖为田者凡八千馀户为田七百馀顷而湖废几尽矣其仅存者东为漕渠自州至于东城六十里南通若耶溪自樵风泾至于桐坞十里皆水广不能十馀丈每岁少雨田未病而湖盖已先涸矣自此以来人争为计说蒋堂则谓宜有罚以禁侵耕有赏以开告者杜杞则谓盗湖为田者利在纵湖水一雨则放声以动州县而斗门辄废故为之立石则水一在五云桥水深八尺有五寸会稽主之一在跨湖桥水深四尺五寸山阴主之而斗门之钥使皆纳于州水溢则遣官视则而谨其闭纵又以谓宜益理堤防斗门其敢田者拔其苗责其力以复湖而重其罚犹以为未也又以谓宜加两县之长以提举之名课其督察而为之殿最吴奎则谓每岁农隙当僦人浚湖积其泥涂以为丘阜使县主役而州与转运使提点刑狱督摄赏罚之张次山则谓湖废仅有存者难卒复宜益广漕路及他便利处使可漕及注民田里置石柱以识之柱之内禁敢田者刁约则谓宜斥湖三之一与民为田而益堤使高一丈则湖可不开而其利自复范师道施元长则谓重侵耕之禁犹不能使民无犯而斥湖与民则侵者孰御又以湖水较之高于城中之水或三尺有六寸或二尺有六寸而益堤壅水使高则水之败城郭庐舍可必也张伯玉则谓日役五千人浚湖使至五尺当十五岁毕至三尺当九岁毕然恐工起之日浮议外摇役夫内溃则虽有智者犹不能必其成若日役五千人益堤使高八尺当一岁毕其竹木之费凡九十二万有三千计越之户二十万有六千赋之而复其租其势易足如此则利可坐收而人不烦弊陈宗言赵诚复以水势高下难之又以谓宜修吴奎之议以岁月复湖当是时都水善其言又以谓宜增赏罚之令其为说如此可谓博矣朝廷未尝不听用而著于法故罚有自钱三百至于千又至于五万刑有自杖百至于徒二年其文可谓密矣然而田者不止而日愈多湖不加浚而日愈废其故何哉法令不行而苟且之俗胜也昔谢灵运从宋文帝求会稽回踵湖为田太守孟不听又求休湖为田又不听灵运至以语诋之则利于请湖为田越之风俗旧矣然南湖繇汉历吴晋以来接于唐又接于钱瞖父子之有此州其利未尝废者彼或以区区之地当天下或以数州为镇或以一国自王内有供养禄廪之须外有贡输问遗之奉非得晏然而已也故强水土之政以力本利农亦皆有数而钱瞖之法最详至今尚多传于人者则其利之不废有以也近世则不然天下为一、而安于承平之故在位者重举事而乐因循而请湖为田者其语言气力往往足以动人至于修水土之利则又费材动众从古所难故郑国之役以谓足以疲秦而西门豹之治邺渠人亦以为烦苦其故如此则吾之吏孰肯任难当之怨来易至之责以待未然之功乎故说虽博而未尝行法虽密而未尝举田者之所以日多湖之所以日废繇是而已故以谓法令不行而苟且之俗胜者岂非然哉夫千岁之湖废兴利害较然易见然自庆历以来三十馀年遭吏治之因循至于既废而世犹莫寤其所以然况于事之隐微难得而考者繇苟简之故而弛坏于冥冥之中又可知其所以然乎今谓湖不必复者曰湖田之入既饶矣此游谈之士为利于侵耕者言之也夫湖未尽废则湖下之田旱此方今之害而众人之所睹也使湖尽废则湖之为田亦旱矣此将来之害而众人之所未睹也故曰此游谈之士为利于侵耕者言之而非实知利害者谓湖不必浚者日益堤壅水而已此好辨之士为乐闻苟简者言之也夫以地势较之壅水使高必败城郭此议者之所已言也以地势较之浚湖使下然后不失其旧不失其旧然后不失其宜此议者之所未言也又山阴之石则为四尺有五寸会稽之石则几倍之壅水使高则会稽得尺山阴得半地之洼隆不并则益堤未为有补也故曰:此好辨之士为乐闻苟简者言之而又非实知利害者也二者既不可用而欲禁侵耕开告者则有赏罚之法矣欲谨水之畜泄则有闭纵之法矣欲痛绝敢田者则拔其苗责其力以复湖而重其罚又有法矣或欲任其责于州县与转运使提点刑狱或欲以每岁农隙浚湖或欲禁田石柱之内者又皆有法矣欲知浚湖之浅深用工若干为日几何欲知增堤竹木之费几何使之安出欲知浚湖之泥涂积之何所又已计之矣欲知工起之日或浮议外摇役夫内溃则不可以必其成又已论之矣诚能收众说而考其可否用其可者而以在我者润泽之令言必行法必举则何功之不可成何利之不可复哉巩初蒙恩通判此州问湖之废兴于人未有能言利害之实者及到官然后问图于两县问书于州与河渠司至于参核之而图成孰究之而书具然后利害之实明故为论次庶夫计议者有考焉熙宁二年冬卧龙斋

Enjoy this site? Please help.Site design and content copyright 2006-2024. When quoting or citing information from this site, please link to the corresponding page or to https://ctext.org/ens. Please note that the use of automatic download software on this site is strictly prohibited, and that users of such software are automatically banned without warning to save bandwidth. 沪ICP备09015720号-3Comments? Suggestions? Please raise them here.