Follow us on Facebook to receive important updates Follow us on Twitter to receive important updates Follow us on sina.com's microblogging site to receive important updates Follow us on Douban to receive important updates
Chinese Text Project Wiki
-> -> -> Search for "垍"
Search details:
Scope: 新唐書糾謬
Condition : Contains text 「垍」
Total 1

新唐書糾謬卷二

16
今案憲宗本紀,元和四年二月丁卯,絪罷相,至三月乙酉,成徳軍節度使王士真方卒,其子承宗自稱留後。十月辛巳,承宗始反,是月,朝廷命吐突承璀為將以討承宗。而盧從史傳云,丁父喪,未官,卽獻計誅王承宗。由是奪服,領澤潞討賊。且旣云從史父喪未官而獻計誅承宗,朝廷因命復領澤潞討賊,則是亦皆在三月王士真死而承宗自立之後也,然則絪當是時已去相久矣。絪傳所述與帝紀及年表并諸人傳皆不相符,其證一也。又案李吉甫以元和二年正月為相,而三年九月出為淮南節度使,至四年三月王士真死承宗自立,十月承宗反而朝廷討之,自後從史方有與承宗連和之事,是時吉甫乃在淮南,何由得譖絪漏言,其證二也。又至五年四月從史方貶死,六年正月吉甫方再入相,是時絪已去相將二朞矣。其年月及絪、從史、吉甫之所在事狀皆參差不相符,其證三也。又李絳傳云:時議還盧從史昭義,已而將復召之,從史以軍無見儲為解,吉甫謂絪漏謀,帝欲逐絪,絳為開白,乃免。其說與絪傳又已不同,且所謂還盧從史昭義,已而將復召之者,何也?豈謂從史旣奪服復領昭義之後,朝廷方欲復召之歟?方憲宗元和之初天下節度使如從史者朝廷有無故而可以輕召者歟?以從史及孔戡、裴、烏重胤、吐突承璀等傳與韓愈杜牧等集而考之,則從史復領昭義之後其勢可復輕召歟?且絪、絳二傳述漏謀之因,既已不同,則其事何可復信。此蓋李絳之門生故吏撰集絳事者,務多書其事以為絳之美,然皆叅錯不實,其後史臣為絪傳者旣無事可紀,故又取絳事而載之,展轉相因,則愈失其真,其證四也。絪傳又云:先是,杜黃裳方為帝夷削節度,強王室,建議裁可,不關決于絪,絪常默默,居位四年,罷。案黃裳以永貞元年七月為相至元和二年正月罷,絪以永貞元年十二月為相至元和四年二月罷,後絪猶居相位二朞始罷。使黃裳方當國,而事不關決,絪常默默,遂先黃裳罷去,以是為絪之貶可也。今黃裳旣已先絪罷,而絪猶居位,複為誰而默默如是者又二年乃始罷去。史筆若此,不亦太近誣乎,其證五也。由是言之,鄭絪傳自為相之後止此二事,後人讀之似皆有實可信,及以紀傳叅考,則全不可用。今列其事如右,且又為旁行編年,瘞次陳之,於後庻覽者了然易見云。

Enjoy this site? Please help.Site design and content copyright 2006-2024. When quoting or citing information from this site, please link to the corresponding page or to https://ctext.org. Please note that the use of automatic download software on this site is strictly prohibited, and that users of such software are automatically banned without warning to save bandwidth. 沪ICP备09015720号-3Comments? Suggestions? Please raise them here.