Follow us on Facebook to receive important updates Follow us on Twitter to receive important updates Follow us on sina.com's microblogging site to receive important updates Follow us on Douban to receive important updates
Chinese Text Project Wiki
-> -> -> Search for "ctext:898540"
This textual edition has had punctuation added automatically using artifical intelligence. The results of this process are inevitably imperfect; please help correct mistakes by editing the text.
Search details:
Scope: 續資治通鑑長編
Condition : References 「知開封府
Total 1

卷三百七十七

10
丁夘,詔大理評事以上毋得更試刑法。 右司諫蘇轍言:「臣前四上章言蔡京知開封府,推行役法,明知舊法人數冗長,近䧏聖㫖,許州縣相度有無妨礙,至於掲簿定差,亦無日限,而京違此指揮,差人監勒開、祥兩縣,一依舊法,人數於數日之內,差撥了當,意欲擾民,以沮成法,兼京曲法庇盖段繼隆贓汙公事,乞先罷京差遣,催督大理寺結絶斷遣,不䝉朝廷施行。尋因京陳乞外任,特除知真定,臣復上言:真定大藩,不當付新進有罪未決之人,朝廷並不省録。今臣竊見成都府路轉運判官蔡朦,施行役法,不曽相度,有無妨碍,督迫州縣差撥衙前,詳定役法官韓維等言其害人,即日降知廣濟軍。臣竊詳蔡京、蔡朦,均是奉行役法,用意刻薄,欲以騷擾百姓,敗壊良法,而京官在侍從,朝有黨人,擢為藩帥,朦以官卑無黨,黜為知軍,同罪異罰,公議不厭。臣又見大理寺勘得李雍經開封府論段䖏約將父知濟州段繼隆進奉空名狀,召人承買,要錢三千貫,奏邢州張家假作外甥事,臣㸔詳李雍所告,段繼隆罪名不輕,若不得實,即李雍無縁不坐誣告之罪,此乃官司行遣之常,蔡京無縁不知,今既以段繼隆為無罪,又卻判放李雍,自相違背,有同兒戯,則其受情反覆,不待勘劾而明,今大理寺乃敢公然用情,恣京妄亂分析,更不勘出情弊。臣今訪聞得案內本寺容縱京等不依公盡理根勘事節,謹具畫一如後:一、李雍初下狀論段䖏約等,京為䖏,約是尚書都省主事,有官合申省勾追,即判申字,既而又言䖏約,恐未是主事,抹卻申字,判勾餘人,勒段䖏約,分析詣實,申此一節,顯是情弊,段䖏約:若係主事,即合申勾,若不係主事,即合直勾,豈有抹卻申字,便不勾追之理。顯見段家闗節未到京,即依公申勾䖏約,闗節既到,更免勾追。一李雍論䖏約賣,奏薦恩澤,已有錢數實狀,及買賣主名,自合將下狀及被論人,并一行證佐,送所司根勘,今但勾到證佐,信令虛妄供狀,稱不是召人承買手分王事,安乞送所司?京執不肯,只以所供虛妄狀詞為慿,顯是情弊,一、京既不肯根勘詣實,却更分外,為䖏約巧作方便,㑹問進奏官奏了何人,要符合處約分析,臣未嘗見官司根勘罪人,不令兩詞自相對辨,卻為罪人外求證佐,便為了當。一、京既慿衆人虛詞執李雍元狀為誣告,已判一「勘」字,即是欲勘李雍誣告之罪,後来又卻抹卻「勘」字,判一「放」字,顯是心知李雍不是誣告,不敢勘問,今大理寺却縱令京等妄稱李雍,係自首,故判放字,臣㸔詳李雍只是自首同情賣官之罪,即不曽自首誣告段處約之罪,何縁以自首判放?信意虛妄,如欺小兒,大理寺官吏無縁不覺,顯是用情庇蓋右,乞朝廷詳酌。上件四事,即京之受倖曲庇段䖏約等,上書詐不實,徒二年,私罪及賣官三千餘貫,未入已贓罪,縱無情弊,其昬繆不職,已當責降,況有上件四事,情狀甚明,兼有前來差役不當,與蔡朦同罪,積此姦弊,合行重責,其大理寺官吏,輒敢觀望權要,用情故出蔡京情罪,亦乞重行責䧏,如朝廷未以臣言為信,乞送御史臺重行根勘,即見實情,究竟如何」。 初,御史中丞劉摯言:摯此章不得其時,因五月十二日,詔孫覺等修立學制,附見按後来摯乞罷置局,乃是五月十五日奏也。「臣竊以學校之制,主於教育人材,非行法之地也,羣居衆聚,帥而齊之,則誠不可以無法,然而法之為學校設者,宜有禮義存焉可也。比嵗太學屢起大獄,其事一出於誣枉,於是有司縁此造為法禁,煩苛凝宻,士之學於其間者,轉身舉足,輒蹈憲網,束縛愈於治獄,條目多於防盜,上下疑貳,求於茍免,先王之意,禮義科㫖,逝已盡矣。法有大可怪者,博士、諸生禁不相見,教諭無所施,質問無所從,但博士月廵所𨽻之齋而已,謂如此則請問者對衆,足以為證佐,以防私情,以杜賄謝。嗟夫學之政令,豈不大繆先王意哉?私情賄謝如是,真可以絶之乎?而又齋數不一,不可以隨經分𨽻也,故使兼廵,如周易博士或廵治禮之齋,禮學博士復廵治詩之舍,徃徃所至備禮請問,相與揖諾,至或不交一言而退。昔之設學校教養之法,師生問對,憤悱開發,相與曲折反復,諄諄善誘,蓋其意不如是之踈也,其道不如是之觳也。先王之於天下,遇人以長者,君子之道,則人必有長者君子之行,而報乎上者斯有禮也,遇人以小人犬豕之道,則彼將以小人犬豕自為,而報乎上者不能有義也。况夫學校之間哉!太學自置三舍之法,寥寥至今,未嘗應令成就一人,豈真無人也?主司懲前日之禍,畏罪避謗,士雖有豪傑㧞萃之才,誰敢題品,以人物自任而置之上第哉?則是先帝有興賢造士之美意,而有司以法害之也。臣愚,欲望聖慈詳酌,罷博士、諸生不許相見之禁,教誨請益,聽其在學徃還,即私有干求饋受,自依敕律,仍乞先次施行外,應太學見行條制,委本監長貳與其屬㸔詳省,其煩宻太甚,取其可行,便於今者,有所増損,著為科條,上禮部,本部再行詳定,上之三省,以聽聖斷」。

Enjoy this site? Please help.Site design and content copyright 2006-2024. When quoting or citing information from this site, please link to the corresponding page or to https://ctext.org. Please note that the use of automatic download software on this site is strictly prohibited, and that users of such software are automatically banned without warning to save bandwidth. 沪ICP备09015720号-3Comments? Suggestions? Please raise them here.